Dear Sir:
Unless the divine power has raised you us to be as Athanasius contra mundum,(1) I see not how you can go through your glorious enterprise in opposing that execrable villainy which is the scandal of religion, o
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjPn7tgvEFyO2mSqRQRClbqi_5n5Za479uKyrOwCgdBjfntRsoRxzXLXrpwSKjMiwzwg55Mnn8YolquzamoyOgsF2uZfdKiObjbOamotjK8-g727rnFsR5bsVfP_X0PtwVR6qJseITUE2oJ/s400/Wesley.jpg)
Reading this morning a tract wrote by a poor African, I was particularly struck by that circumstance that a man who has a black skin, being wronged or outraged by a white man, can have no redress; it being a "law" in our colonies that the oath of a black against a white goes for nothing. What villainy is this?
That he who has guided you from youth up may continue to strengthen you in this and all things, is the prayer of, dear sir,
Your affectionate servant,
John Wesley
(1)"Athanasius contra mundum" means Athanasius against the world. Athanasius of Alexandria (c. 296-373 AD) was a early church father who fought against Arianism (an early Church heresy that taught Jesus was a subservient and created being).
4 comments:
Only further proves my point that John Wesley was the man. 8)
It's fascinating to read someone back then writing against the evils of slavery, during a time when most people shrug off pro-slavery beliefs as "normal."
Hi Tony, yeah Wesley was the man. :)
Additional thought: I remember your statements regarding the comparison between Arminian and abolition ideals - I think it's fitting to mention that here.
Hi Tony, You're right. I think it tells us a lot that Wesley was fighting slavery at the same time Edwards and Whitefield were promoting it.
Post a Comment